Samsung’s Exynos 2400 Proves Itself A Powerful In Ray Tracing & Performance


Samsung debuted its Galaxy S24 series recently, which includes the Galaxy S24, Galaxy S24+, both of which are powered by the Exynos 2400 chipset in most regions, and the Galaxy S24 Ultra, which is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset.

However, it’s not the first time that Samsung has powered its Galaxy devices with its own manufactured chipset, but things didn’t go well before. After a long time, finally, Samsung came over with its powerful and efficient Exynos 2400 chipset in most countries worldwide.

Before the Exynos 2400 chipset, Samsung introduced the Exynos 2200 with the Galaxy S22 series, and unfortunately, that didn’t result in satisfactory performance. So for the Galaxy S23 series, the brand goes with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset. Now that all the tests have revealed satisfying results, Exynos 2400 is a remarkable improvement as compared to Exynos 2200.

Although it’s not enough to compete only with the previous Exynos chips but also with the other strong competitors available in markets such as MediaTek, Apple, and Qualcomm,

Samsung introduced the Exynos 2400, which did an extremely efficient job. By the 3DMark Solar Bay test, it is known that the ray tracing performance is far better as compared to its previous version. It scored 8,642 points and consumed 9.3W of power, whereas the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 scored 8,601 points but consumed 11.7W of power. AMD’s RDNA-3-based Xclipse 940 GPU architecture is remarkable for ray tracing. This is being speculated on by a test taken by a YouTuber named Golden Reviewer.

The tests indicate that the Exynoss 2400 performs better than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, but unfortunately a bit lower than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Whereas the Dimesity 9300 in the 3DMark Wildlife Extreme test. Also, it performs better than the Dimensity 9300 but less efficiently than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Basically, with the Exynos 2400, Samsung did a great job as compared to the Exynos 2200.

In the GFXBench 3.1 (1080p resolution) conclusion, the Exynos 2400 performed well as compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 but was not lower than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 or the Domestic 9300. Jumping on the efficiency, the Exynos 2400 is better than the Apple A16 Bionic and the Dimesity 9300, as well as the Dimensity 9200 and the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.

In the GFXBench Aztec test, which uses Vukan APIs on Android devices and Metal APIs on Apple’s devices, the Exynos 2400 performed better as compared to the Apple A16 Bionic, Dimensity 9200, and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. But yet, it fails to compete with the Dimensity 9300 and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.

At the end, it’s a fact that Exynos 2400’s efficiency is almost as great as Dimensity 9200, and Dimesity 9200, plus, the efficiency of Exynos 2400 is also better than the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and nearly 2x better than the Exynos 2100 and the Exynos 2200.

Don’t miss our latest news on Samsung technology. Follow SamLover.com on your favorite social media platforms for instant notifications.